English 中文 Email:inquiry@yuchai.cn

Contact Us

  • Phone:86-10-65388719
  • Fax:86-10-65388719
  • Address:Room 802, Building S, Xingchuang International Center, Daxing District, Beijing,China
  • Email:inquiry@yuchai.cn

Position: news

Coal vs. electricity; a change of direction

Upon Monday, President Barack Obama took the initiative as well as mandated even steeper green house gas cuts from Oughout. S. power plants compared to previously expected, while allowing states more time and wider options to comply. The actual tweaks to Obama’s unparalleled emissions limits on energy plants, aim to address the bevy of concerns elevated by both environmentalist and also the energy industry, primarily relating to the future of coal.
To the pleasure of environmental groups, Obama tightened the emissions specifications. Obama’s proposal from a year ago set the target as a 30 % nationwide cut by 2030, compared to the levels in july 2004. His revamped plan requires a 32 percent reduce in the same time period.
Allow unchanged, however , is Obama’s overall goal for Ough. S. emissions cuts through all sources of pollution, such as cars and trucks. So , what does this mean with regard to California - already the actual nation’s leader in discovering new energy sources? Coal-fired vegetation aren’t much of a factor in the particular Golden State, compared to photo voltaic and hydro projects. Primarily, the state is interested in wringing as much energy as it can from existing users. Right now their state is looking to ensure all motorists help maintain California’s potholed highways and highways by thinking about a temporary $100 annual charge on electric vehicles, that we think is a pretty good idea.
The easy fact is that the way all of us pay for the upkeep of our own roadways - a energy tax - made feeling back when it was created, whenever gasoline and diesel gas were inexpensive and most vehicles got about the same miles for each gallon. Currently, a driver here who drives regarding 12, 000 miles annually with a gasoline engine which gets 23 miles for every gallon pays about $184 in fuel taxes.
Right now, with increasingly fuel-efficient automobiles, along with hybrids, natural-gas, hydrogen and all-electric cars, usage is all over the map. Electrical vehicles are falling on price, and gas-powered vehicles tend to be engineered to last longer. Include into the mix the real chance of hydrogen powered cars and also there’s less money to keep the roads in decent form, although the while cutting contaminants.
Only recently did Ramos Oil Company in To the west Sacramento start providing using the owners of hydrogen-cars the opportunity to fill their fill their own tanks just like any other automobile. The station, equipped with sophisticated technology developed by Linde The united states Inc, has been designated because officially open by almost all relevant stakeholders and regulators.
Kent Ramos, president associated with Ramos Oil Company, stated he is “very impressed with all the exciting technology Linde taken to us. We have been serving typically the Sacramento Valley market having a variety of fuels for over sixty years. Hydrogen’s zero emissions technology fits perfectly in to our multi-fuel platform idea and I believe will provide evidence that hydrogen has a place in often the transportation fuel mix. ” Ramos Oil, one of the biggest Latino-owned companies in the You. S., is one of the first oil retailers in California in order to embrace clean fuels. Along with conventional fuels, the company provides bio-diesel, ethanol-85, methanol and today hydrogen.

In the long run, since gasoline sources are only going to be a little more complicated and the cuts actually deeper, we need to find a much better way of paying for the building along with upkeep of California’s roads, simply because we still need all of them.
The current system is too susceptible to gas-price variations and the otherwise-laudable fact that mileage is getting far better in all types of vehicles.
1 option that has been discussed would be to base highway taxes upon miles driven per car. But that seems an awful idea to us. It will get complicated in creating methods to monitor how far each is actually driven. Odometer reporting? Which can be monkeyed with, as used-car salesmen of old realized. GPS data? That increases privacy concerns.
In assessments set for Oregon the coming year with 5, 000 offer drivers being charged 1 . five cents a mile, motorists will need to choose from several recording choices.
Such experiments are necessary once we search for new funding versions to meet changing transit facts, as well as the possibility of new strength sources.

 

www.yuchaiie.com

 

Friend links